Home
Our Services
Why Use Us?
Client Testimonials
Legal Library
Newsletters
Rotherhams Legal Update - August 2004
May 2004
Feb 2004
Sept 2003
Rotherhams Legal Update - Spring 2004
Legal Update Autumn 2005
Rotherhams Legal Update Spring 2005
Legal Update Summer 2005/06
FAQ's
Make an Appointment
Useful Links
Contact Us
 

I hope you enjoy our last Legal Update for the year.  Thank you for your valued support throughout 2004 and we look forward to bringing you more information and personal assistance next year.

Christmas is a time for sharing special moments with those close to us. It is also, for some, a very sad or lonely time of year and it is our sincere wish that you will be spending some time over the next few weeks with family or close friends.

From all of us at Rotherhams..........we wish you and your families a very Merry Christmas and a happy, safe and relaxing New Year.

Until next time, take care.

Shelly Rotherham


 Rotherhams Legal Update:
Summer 2004/05                                                              

........ IN THIS ISSUE ..........           
  Economic Disparity?  - What does this mean for you?
  Closing The Gaps.....  - The Holidays Amendment Act 2004 and public holidays
  Shelly's Hot Tip  - Adding emails to Tasks
  Have You Played The Pokies Lately? - Key points on The Gambling Act 2003
  Who Pays The Ferryman? - A snippet of Greek mythology
  Buying A Car Privately?  - Do your homework!
  Office Closure - Don't procrastinate!

  Our last Legal Update - The contents from our last issue in case you missed it

   

Economic Disparity - What Does This Mean For You?


Section 15 of the Property Relationships Act 1976 was introduced to address issues of inequality between partners following a breakdown of their relationship. The section empowers the Court, following a division of relationship property, to compensate a spouse/partner if his or her living standards and income will be significantly less than the other party because of the division of functions in the relationship.

Why?
The intention behind the section is to recognise that one partner may be economically disadvantaged as a result of a relationship ending because of the division of functions during the relationship. That disadvantage will not be overcome by an equal division of relationship property.

Reported decisions on the section are now accumulating and the limits of the section are being tested.

When Will It Apply?
The section will apply where there is a real and significant difference between the respective income and living standards of each partner. The disparity must arise from the division of functions in the relationship and not, for example, from a difference in earning capacities which existed before the relationship began.

The most typical circumstance will be where one party compromises a career to look after children and/or to assist a high flying partner to increase his or her earning capacity.

Finally for an award to be made, there must be circumstances which convince the Judge that it is just to compensate the disadvantaged party. In considering whether it is just to make an award, a Judge will usually consider factors such as:

  • The length of the relationship;
  • The length of the career break;
  • The length of time required to rectify the break in career path;
  • The position of the children now and in the future;
  • The career possibilities available to the disadvantaged person; and
  • The amount of property available for division.

While this section has not and will not produce a flood of claims, it is important that the circumstances of each possible claimant are considered at the point of separation.

A departing partner who treats the other partner of lesser means with consideration and kindness following the separation may well be limiting the chance of a successful claim being made against him or her.

Ongoing support following a separation through assistance with housing or voluntary maintenance payments will certainly influence the Court in the exercise of its discretion. In reality, the partner providing the assistance is already recognising the economic disadvantages which have flowed from the separation.

Be Aware
A successful award of compensation can result in a significant payment. One recent court decision, in recognising the economic disparity, made an adjustment to the division of assets of $75,000.00.

Back to Index

Subscribe  now if you've been sent this Newsletter
 

Closing The Gaps - Holidays Amendment Act 2004   


Are you required to work on a public holiday? Thinking of calling in sick, being paid time-and-a-half, and getting an additional holiday? Recent amendments to the Holidays Act 2003 ("Act") will foil any such plan.

The Act came into force on 1 April 2004. Following the introduction of the Act, a number of unintended consequences soon came to light. Controversy surrounding these consequences quickly led to the drafting of the Holidays Amendment Act 2004 that took effect on 25 October 2004, just in time for Labour Day.

Whether you are an employer or an employee, if you wish to read a little more on this issue read our plain English  article 

Back to Index
 

Shelly's Hot Tip - Drag Emails to Tasks


I hope you enjoyed my Drag 'n Drop emails to Contacts tip in the last newsletter.  If you missed it click here .  Did you get tricky and try other Drag 'n Drop moves?

Another one I use frequently is dragging emails (have them closed) into Tasks.

Drag 'n Drop to Tasks
It works the same way as dropping to Contacts. The beauty of this is that you can then pop that Task into a Category, set it for a particular day and time, set a reminder, track progress on a project, assign it to someone else etc etc.

What I also find great is that the original email stays in your Mail as well.  Rather than ending up looking at all your Tasks once you have performed this 'move', you are returned to the email ready for you to reply, delete, save in a folder or whatever else you may wish to do with it.

I prefer this to flagging emails although I'll touch on this subject next time.

Remember if you have a fantastic time saving tip on anything to do with computers, let me know and I'll happily share it with all our subscribers.

Back to Index

Subscribe  now if you've been sent this Newsletter

Have You Played The Pokies Lately?   


The aim of the new Gambling Act 2003 which replaced the Gaming Lotteries Act 1977 and the Casino Control Act 1990 in September 2003 was to provide a regulatory framework for gambling in New Zealand.

Major changes include the number of machines at a venue and the distribution of gross profits.

Other measures aimed at minimising the harm caused by gambling include limiting banknote acceptors and the placement of automatic teller machines in gambling areas.

To read more on this subject read our full summary .

Back to Index

Who Pays The Ferryman?   


According to Greek mythology
To be properly buried, a coin called an obol needed to be placed under your tongue. This would then be presented to Charon (the ferryman of the River Styx), as payment for the crossing of the river. The entrance to Hades, the underworld, was on the other side of the river.

If you were not buried with a coin in your mouth you were destined to wander the banks of the Styx until you found the paupers entrance to Hades.

So, who pays the ferryman in New Zealand?
The answer it seems is your executor - if there are assets in your estate.

Recent Case
Recently the High Court was asked to consider the following situation:

Mr V had died and the Public Trustee had been appointed as the executor of his estate.

Mrs V made the funeral arrangements and asked the funeral directors to forward the account for the costs of the funeral to the Public Trustee.

The Public Trustee was then faced with the problem that the only asset in Mr V's estate was a one third share of the house that he shared with Mrs V.  There were no cash assets or any other assets in the estate, from which it could pay the account.

The account was not paid and the funeral directors brought proceedings in the District Court to recover payment either from Mrs V (who had arranged the funeral) or the Public Trustee as executor.  The funeral directors were successful, with the Public Trustee being found liable to pay the account.

The Public Trustee appealed the decision, questioning whether they should be required to pay when there was no money available, and the only asset in the estate was a share of the house. Everybody agreed that Mrs V was not at fault and was not liable.  The question for the High Court on appeal was whether in the circumstances, the Public Trustee could also escape liability.

In the High Court it was held that where there were assets in the Estate, (even if not in money form), the executor was liable to pay.  The Public Trustee, (or any executor) had the power to realise (sell)  the assets or raise a loan against the assets to pay if necessary, although it was clear that it was not going to happen in this case. The Public Trustee had to pay the account from its own funds.

It is still unclear whether an executor will be personally liable for costs where the estate has no assets.  In fact the Judge in this case was careful not to answer that question or a number of others that were posed, including the liability of executors to dispose of the body of the deceased.

The Moral of This Story
Be aware of your obligations as an executor.  If you are appointed as an executor, be sure to consult with a solicitor before undertaking any action on behalf of the estate, including making funeral arrangements, especially if there is doubt about the estate's ability to pay for the funeral.

Be careful - for it may be you that is liable to pay the ferryman.

Back to Index

Subscribe  now if you've been sent this Newsletter

Buying A Car Privately?


Do Your Homework
If someone in your household is thinking of buying a car privately, it pays to remember a few simple things to ensure the transaction proceeds smoothly.  Otherwise, you could find yourself liable for charges incurred by someone else or, in the worst case, lose your car altogether.

Little Legal Protection
If you buy privately, you will not be protected by the Consumer Guarantees Act, the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act or the Fair Trading Act.  If something goes wrong in a private sale, your legal remedies are likely to be limited to the Contractual Remedies Act and the Sale of Goods Act.

Tips
For a list of tips on things you must do before buying a car privately, as well as links to information on the change of ownership procedure click here .  Don't forget to share this information with a friend if they are considering buying a car privately - you may save them a great deal of heartache.

Back to Index  

Subscribe  now if you've been sent this Newsletter

Office Closure
We close for the Christmas break at 12 noon on Friday 24 December, reopening again on Monday 10 January 2005.

New Year Resolution - Plan Early
If the Christmas rush is holding you up from attending to those niggling matters you have been 'meaning to see' your lawyer about, January is always a good time to revisit them.  Why not arrange an appointment for the New Year with us now?  Another job you can tick off your list to help clear the mind!  Make an appointment now .

Back to Index

Our Last Legal Update  
If you missed the last Newsletter you can access it on our website .  You are more than welcome to share our Legal Update with friends and colleagues too.

Back to Index


Website:         www.rotherhams.co.nz
Telephone:    +64 3 343 6380
Facsimile:      +64 3 343 6381 
Address:         Christchurch Office
                         Level 1, 85 Riccarton Road, P O Box 80162, Christchurch, New Zealand
                          Kaikoura Office 
                         Hospital Building, Kaikoura - postal address as per Christchurch



Worksite is a great Government information site which provides up to date and reliable information about work, skills and employment opportunities in New Zealand.  Well worth looking at.

Selling property?  Remember the rollover clause - 

Buying property?  Why Solicitor's Approval of Agreement/Title clause not safe -

The Power of Attorney - just how much Power is granted? See our FAQ's to

Christchurch - What's on  -

Web design New Zealand by Acclipse

Copyright 2010 Rotherhams - Barristers and Solicitors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy